How to Get Employees to Seize Opportunities at Work: Behavioral Science Insights and Case Studies
Helena Vlahinja Klauznicer
10/17/20245 min read
How to get employees to seize opportunities at work
When organizations offer beneficial employee programs—from professional development opportunities to digital transformation initiatives and wellness programs—it’s easy to assume that employees will naturally take advantage of them. Yet, many do not. Why? And how can organizations encourage employees to seize these opportunities?
In this article, we delve into behavioral science insights to understand why employees make decisions that deviate from what seems rational or optimal. By addressing the psychological and structural barriers to participation, leaders can significantly improve employee engagement. We'll explore the key barriers to take-up, behavioral strategies that can help overcome them, and case studies that illustrate practical ways to boost participation in workplace initiatives.
Why don’t employees seize opportunities?
Employees often fail to take advantage of clearly beneficial opportunities due to a variety of cognitive and behavioral barriers. Research by Cass Sunstein and Dafna Bearson identifies several reasons for this behavior:
Learning costs: The time and effort required to understand an opportunity—its eligibility criteria, benefits, and processes—can deter participation. When information is difficult to find or overly complex, employees may feel discouraged from taking part, even if it would be advantageous.
Compliance costs: Administrative hurdles such as lengthy forms or required documentation create friction that can prevent employees from participating. The perception of these compliance costs often leads to inaction.
Psychological costs: Factors like stigma, frustration, and a perceived loss of autonomy discourage participation. Employees may avoid programs if they perceive negative social judgments or feel that their independence is compromised.
Scarcity and complexity: When individuals face scarcity—such as limited time, cognitive bandwidth, or financial resources—their ability to make optimal decisions is impaired. Cognitive overload and complexity make it challenging to assess long-term benefits, which often leads to inaction.
Hassle and sludge: Administrative obstacles, or "sludge," include bureaucratic processes and paperwork. These seemingly minor hassles can significantly impact participation, especially when paired with procrastination, resulting in reduced take-up rates.
Present bias and misperception of risks: Present bias refers to focusing on immediate costs rather than future benefits. For example, the effort needed to attend a training session may be perceived as more significant than the long-term benefits of the program. Combined with misperceptions of risk, this bias discourages employees from seizing beneficial opportunities.
Behavioral solutions to increase program take-up
Behavioral science offers several strategies to help employees overcome these barriers and make better decisions. Some key interventions include:
Simplify processes: Streamline application forms and reduce the number of steps required to participate. Simplifying the process helps lower compliance costs and makes participation more accessible.
Leverage social norms: People are influenced by what others are doing. Highlight that most employees are already participating in a program, which can create a sense of social proof and motivate others to join.
Reminder and nudges: Simple reminders—such as email notifications or timely prompts—help employees overcome procrastination and forgetfulness, increasing program participation.
Automatic enrollment: Automatically enroll individuals in beneficial programs and provide them with the option to opt out. This method, known as default enrollment, can significantly improve take-up rates by leveraging inertia.
Case Study 1: Digital upskilling in a manufacturing firm
A manufacturing company faced resistance when implementing a new digital production management tool, despite the benefits. Employees were accustomed to the old system and viewed the new one as disruptive. The main barriers were overconfidence in existing practices, lack of perceived need for change, and the learning costs of adopting the new tool.
To address these barriers, the company introduced several behavioral nudges:
Endorsements by early adopters: The company created a community of early adopters, offering them specialized training and public recognition. These employees became internal advocates, sharing success stories that demonstrated the tool's positive impact on efficiency, leveraging the power of social norms.
Framing the tool as an enhancement: Instead of framing the tool as something that would replace employees' existing roles, it was positioned as a way to enhance strategic decision-making by automating routine tasks. This reassured employees that their jobs were not at risk.
Training incentives: To reduce perceived learning costs, the company made training more attractive by offering non-financial incentives such as extra breaks and public recognition. The training was also designed to be modular and accessible, reducing hassle and time commitment.
These strategies led to a higher-than-expected adoption rate, showing how effective social influence, framing, and reducing friction can be in facilitating new technology adoption.
Case Study 2: Financial wellness programs in a retail chain
A large retail chain introduced a financial wellness program offering free financial counseling and subsidized savings plans. Despite the benefits, initial participation was low. The reasons included employees feeling they didn’t have enough time to participate (scarcity), a cumbersome sign-up process (sludge), and an underestimation of the long-term value of saving (present bias).
The retail chain implemented the following interventions:
Automatic enrollment with opt-out: All eligible employees were automatically enrolled in the savings plan, with the option to opt out. This approach reduced the hassle of sign-up and took advantage of inertia.
Reminders and simplification: Personalized reminders were sent to employees, emphasizing the ease of participation. The company also reduced the number of required forms and steps to streamline the process.
Social proof: The company shared testimonials from employees who had benefited from the program in newsletters and on noticeboards, showing that many colleagues were already participating.
As a result, participation in the program increased by 40%. Employees reported feeling more secure in their finances, and those who used the financial counseling were more likely to increase their contributions to the savings plan.
5 steps to boost employee participation in workplace programs
To improve the take-up of beneficial opportunities at work, Sunstein and Bearson suggest that organizations can consider implementing the following steps:
Conduct a take-up audit: Review participation rates for different programs and identify gaps. Compare high and low take-up rates to identify potential barriers.
Understand employees' behavior: Treat employees as customers with diverse needs. Invest in understanding their cognitive biases and decision-making processes.
Simplify and reduce friction: Minimize paperwork and administrative hurdles to make participation easier. Automate enrollment where appropriate.
Leverage behavioral insights: Use social norms, nudges, and timely reminders to encourage participation. Highlight that many of their peers are benefiting from these opportunities.
Monitor and iterate: Track participation rates and gather employee feedback to identify areas for improvement. Regularly conduct "sludge audits" to identify and remove unnecessary hurdles.
Conclusion
ncreasing employee participation in beneficial programs requires more than just offering them—it involves strategic design that addresses the real-world cognitive and behavioral barriers faced by employees. Behavioral science teaches us that small nudges, reducing friction, leveraging social norms, and simplifying processes can significantly increase engagement. By applying these insights, organizations can ensure employees fully benefit from available opportunities, ultimately creating a more engaged and productive workforce.
The case studies presented here demonstrate how behavioral interventions can overcome the cognitive and emotional barriers that deter participation. When leaders thoughtfully design opportunities and tailor their communication, they can transform passive offers into actively sought opportunities.
Unlock the power of behavioural science.
Unlock the power of behavioral science in your organization.
Learn how to create effective employee programs, boost engagement, and design impactful behavioral interventions
Contact
helena@insightfully.eu
andrijana@insightfully.eu
+385 91 916 33 37